Some
thoughts and questions about the Principle of Means and Ends
as it relates to 9/11...
If a pit bull attacks my 2-year-old, I do what it takes
to remove the immediate physical threat. I use violence to
severely injure it or kill it in order to protect my child.
The end I seek is a peaceful life with my family. So I
realize that I have violated the principle of means and
ends, but have saved my kid.
Wouldn't you agree that it would be ludicrous in that
situation to make a peaceful request for the doggie to
please stop, or to sit cross-legged and chant something like
"All is love," "I love this pit bull just the way he is," or
"Ah, I see that this perceived attacker is using his free
will to express his love in the manner that is perfect for
all involved?"
I am quite unsure as to how to respond to the 9/11
terrorists, but I believe that if our response on 9/12 was
to simply reflect on the love and perfection of it all, the
attackers certainly would have thought "Hah! They are the
fools we believe them to be. Proceed to strike the next 3
targets and kill thousands more!"
Arnold, I believe in and have experienced the results of
the means and ends principle, but aren't there some who are
just bent on doing what they believe is right regardless of
cost of human life? And shouldn't that be met with some kind
of resistance because, however illusory, we value this
physical life?